ongopt
689
Ah but the percentage of birds killed by these is significantly less by birds killed by air pollution and acid rain in this country. It’s not even close.
Apr 10, 2024,03:55 AM
These blades are big enough and slow enough that most Swainson’s and Red Tail hawks here in north central California will avoid them. Also each successive generation will learn not to go near them.
Comments:
view entire thread
Thanks!
By: ongopt : April 10th, 2024-03:48
However I would disagree. Everyone’s idea of beauty is different but I have always imagined them as peaceful giants. They are clean energy and the farmers in this area of California ( Vallejo and Fairfield) do get money for these. Coal power acid rain kil...
Thanks!
By: ongopt : April 10th, 2024-03:51
If birds had a say...
By: Henke : April 10th, 2024-00:43
they would protest many other things first... "Results show that the onset of shale oil and gas production reduces subsequent bird population counts by 15%, even after adjusting for location and year fixed effects, weather, counting effort, and anthropic ...
Yes,
By: Henke : April 10th, 2024-04:26
I'm sure that if the bird didn't get instantly vaporised by the focusing mirrors (on a wind turbine? Hang on, what are we talking about again?) they would totally be able to measure these things. But to answer your question, nowhere does the source say, o...
Indeed
By: Henke : April 10th, 2024-05:30
Human activity in general has a profoundly negative effect on wildlife! That's an unfortunate point we can never get away from. It is never choosing between absolute positive and absolute negative, but rather between more bad and less bad... But just beca...
Also a very good point-
By: Henke : April 10th, 2024-14:55
So logically, surely you must disregard all studies supporting oil and gas, as they would have much more money and influence to fund these studies, having accumulated and entrenched their position over the past hundred years? This is speaking from experie...
Thanks!😊
By: ongopt : April 20th, 2024-09:37